This post comes from this LINK — September 18, 2020
J.S.) Vaccines have a history of contamination with viruses.
The cancer causing simian vacuole virus type 40 (SV40) that contaminated the polio vaccines in the 50s and 60s [was] given to over 90 million Americans and more people in other countries.
And the WHO introduced the weaponized versions of Ebola, Marburg's disease and Lassa fever as well as the AIDS virus through their smallpox vaccines administered in Africa in the late 1970s.
The WHO discusses their development of synthetic selectively immune suppressing viruses and their desire to introduce them through routine human vaccine trials in the Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1972 and the Federation Proceedings 1972. In these documents the WHO discusses making synthetic viruses to selective[ly] destroy the immune system by destroying T4 (CD4) cells, B cells or antibodies while leaving the rest of the immune system intact. Of course the HIV virus selectively destroys CD4 cells. They go in to say that they wanted to introduce these “well defined” viral antigens through routine human vaccinations focusing mainly on families, particularly sibships (brothers and sisters) with a clean genetic population, such as African villages.
All these viruses appeared at the same exact time and in the same exact African villages where the WHO was conducting their Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI) starting in 1977.
The WHO had already been warned a couple of times that their vaccines were contaminated with viruses, yet did nothing to correct the problem.
When the EPI ended the Ebola, Marburg's disease and Lassa fever all disappeared on their own since no vaccine or treatment existed for these viruses.
There were also 18,000 Haitian workers that were given the vaccines leading to the sudden appearance of HIV in Haiti.
Blood samples taken prior to the EPI from the African villages receiving the vaccines showed no presence of these viruses prior to the EPI.
The AIDS virus was introduced in to the U.S. through an experimental hepatitis vaccine trial headed by a Russian doctor named Wolfe Szmuness.
Szmuness left Russia in 1968 and was appointed the head of the largest blood bank in the world, the New York City Blood Bank, in 1969 the same year the U.S. Government requested funding for the production of the AIDS virus (Senate Subcommittee Hearings for Chemical-Biological Warfare Appropriations for 1970, part 6, July 1, 1969 page 1). Biological weapons were outlawed a few years later though making the virus obsolete for this purpose. Under Article X of the treaty banning biological warfare agents though the virus was allowed to be exchanged internationally for “peaceful purposes”, which includes disease research such as how it would affect people injected with vaccines contaminated with the virus. The virus was therefore given to the WHO for their EPI experiments.
How does a Russian doctor leave Russia and the following year be made the head of the NYC Blood Bank the following year in the middle of the Cold War unless something really serious is going on?
Szmuness set the parameters for the experimental hepatitis B vaccine test. These included the participants had to be gay or bisexual, in good health with no exposure to hepatitis B and they had to be under the age of 40. That last part is very important because the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) clearly stated in the early days of AIDS that a person could not have AIDS if they were over the age of 40. Why would the CDC make such as claim about a new virus they supposedly knew nothing about unless they were aware of how the virus was being introduced and for what reasons?
There were 10,000 men recruited for the study. By the end of the study in 1984 56% of the participants had developed full blown AIDS. Keep in mind that when doing a test roughly 50% of participants actually get what is being tested for and the remainder are controls, which explains the 56%.
The link between the vaccine program in NYC and the appearance of AIDS was reported in a couple of articles printed in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). Interesting though that these studies can be found in the journal available in the medical libraries, but cannot be found online even on PubMed, which is source for various medical journals and their articles.
The experimental hepatitis vaccine program was repeated in San Francisco, Los Angeles, Denver, St. Louis and Miami. These are all the remaining original "hot spots" for the appearance of AIDS in the U.S.
Also keep in mind that on a worldwide basis AIDS started in the heterosexual community and has always been predominately in the heterosexual community. The U.S. is the only country in the world where AIDS started in the homosexual population and they were the only ones participating in the experimental hepatitis vaccine program.
Our government has a long history of conducting horrific and deadly experiments on its citizens. The Tuskegee Alabama syphilis experiment, the Hanover radiation experiments where they released radioactive gas on the town to test the effects, the LSD testing of the 50s on military personnel, prisoners and civilians, the bacterial warfare experiments where they sprayed U.S. cities in the 50s with synthetic bacteria to test if biological agents could be spread by spraying or contaminating public transportation sites that resulted in various deaths, etc. All of this is well documented, problem is most people never put forth any effort to research what is really going on.
P.L.)
Do you believe that the Hepatitis B - and Polio vaccines are still contaminated with viruses?
My infant is due for his mandatory vaccines soon. It's just so many vaccines
Apparently the vaccine manufacturers recommend that babies be vaccinated at 3 months. In South Africa the program starts at 6 weeks. Or 8 weeks if preferred. Since baby was born at 38 weeks gestation, surely I may start the program at 8 weeks from the due date.. I think i read you saying that it does not make sense to immunize an infant, since their immune systems can not make antibodies yet? So at what age would immunization actually work?
Do you have a write up on vaccines for infants?
Do you know what I can give the baby to minimize immunization side effects?
J.S.)
I doubt they are contaminated these days. Some of those were controlled experiments, such as with the introduction of HIV as well as the weaponized versions of Ebola, Marburg's disease and Lassa fever. I don't trust the covid shots though. Note, I did not call them vaccines as only Johnson and Johnson is a vaccine. Moderna and Pfizer by medical definition are not vaccines, they are genetic modifiers, which ironically have had more proven deaths from these than proven covid deaths. And they have [been] pushing way too hard to make sure everyone gets these shots including re[s]orting to felony coercion all for a virus with around a 99% recovery rate. Makes no sense. There are so many deadlier viruses and diseases that they are not instituting mandatory lockdowns, masks and shots for. Why? This clearly is not about saving lives. Alcohol and tobacco kill more people each year than covid, even with the highly over-inflated numbers. So, if they really wanted to save lives they would start there. This is really about control, taking away our rights and identity and who knows what else. On top of that about 99% of what the government and media has shoved down our throats about covid has been outright lies contradicted by credible medical studies. Why Fauci is the highest paid government employee when he clearly knows nothing about basic virology is beyond me. I guess being a parroting propaganda puppet is the job to have if you want to make the big bucks. Can't recall if I did a write up or not on vaccinating infants, but did do a video a while back. Unfortunately, my other site being hosted by GoDaddy disappeared and has ads for an Australian gym. Called GoDaddy the other day and they were not much help. First they wanted to charge me to fix the problem. When I kept pressing the question of why it was down when it has been fine all these years and no changes have been made to it in at least 8 years they offered some free tech support instead of answering my question, but told me their tech support, which is supposed to be 24/7 was not available right now. So, I have no idea if I will be able to recover all the information on that site. In short though, it makes NO SENSE to vaccinate infants. Infants are not born with intact immune function. This is why they are reliant on maternal antibodies from breast milk, and flora to provide immune support until the immune system can fully mature. Most of this is not until around the age of 2, but full immune maturity such as through the adrenals does not occur until around the age of 5. So why would doctors and the government be so stupid as to give vaccines to infants, especially newborns? The idea of a vaccine is to stimulate an antibody response to the antigen. Since newborns cannot produce their own antibodies properly, which is why they are reliant on maternal antibodies until their immune systems mature, vaccinating infants in my opinion is sheer stupidity. We have no clue what these antigens, and preservatives are doing to these humans in the short term, and especially in the long term. Look at the Thimerosal for example in vaccines. There was a major spike in cases of autism when this started being added to vaccines, which makes perfect sense. Thimerosal contains ethyl mercury, and it is well known that mercury has an affinity for fat tissue, such as the brain, and is may more toxic to rapidly dividing cells such as those of an infant's developing brain. Some people have tried to argue that since this is ethyl mercury and not the more toxic methyl mercury that it is not a problem. These people have no clue what they are talking about. First of all, less toxic does not mean non-toxic. Secondly, studies have shown that ethyl mercury is converted in to the more toxic methyl mercury by gut flora. So there goes their argument. And why did the government lie about no change in autism rates when they claimed to have taken all the Thimerosal out of childhood vaccines? They did not lie about there being no significant change in autism rates, what they lied about was taking the Thimerosal out of all the childhood vaccines. They only took the Thimerosal out of SOME of the childhood vaccines, which means the children were still being exposed to the brain damaging mercury. If they really thought there would be no change, and they really wanted to prove their point, then they would have removed the Thimerosal from all the childhood vaccines. Instead, they manipulated the study and lied to the public because they knew there was a solid link between the Thimerosal and the sudden spike in autism cases. As for what to do to minimize potential side effects, there is no simple or clear answer since we have no clue what half the crap is they put in these vaccines, nor what all their short and again especially long-term side effects are.
L.K.)
I believe Earthing is a major healthful action to take, as it restores negative charge to the body, which improves blood flow, reduces high blood pressure, helps remove inflammation etc. See Earthing & Grounding: Science & Benefits (15 min documentary)