TRUMP SHOOTING FAKE, MAYBE

Update: I'm Less Certain of Fakery Now

UPDATE:

Candace Owens is claiming that the Deep State intended to eliminate Trump via assassination. But I disagree. Instead, I agree with Mathis that the shooting was likely staged. The whole thing about Trump being an opponent or enemy of the Deep State seems to be totally bogus. See for example this recent video: Donald Trump is NOT a 'threat to the deep state'. Here is his warmongering record (same as Biden’s).

VIDEO #1.

I’m suspicious of nearly everything in the media, but when I saw the footage of the Trump shooting incident, I thought it looked very real. Closer inspection shows possible fakery. Following are pics and excerpts from Mathis’ new paper, The Trump Shooting was of course Staged, at https://mileswmathis.com/crooks.pdf.

Since I have proved to you everything else is fake, that should be our logical and default assumption for any new highly promoted event. FAKE. But somehow all the other fake events specialists like Alex Jones and Mike Adams have forgotten that basic rule. Everyone seems to have conveniently forgotten what a false flag is these days. When was the last time Jones outed a false flag, or even used the term? Strange, since that is how he made his name. Before 911 he was just a loud obnoxious guy on Austin public access, but when he started yelling that 911 was a false flag, his big rise began. Today, Jones couldn't spot a false flag from a foot away. He couldn't spot moulage or any other clue to save his life. Instead he is promoting this fake event like there is no tomorrow, never even considering the possibility it might be staged. Same for Mike Adams, who published a standard report on the event yesterday, but nothing more.

IMAGE #1. {I disagree with Mathis’ first statement which follows.}

Before we get into it, let me just state the obvious: in that “iconic” photo, Trump is not saying “fight”, he is saying “fuck”. {I believe Trump said “Fight”.}

IMAGE #2.

Then we have the bad moulage job, where some make-up girl was hiding behind the podium and smeared some fake blood on Trump when he kneeled down. It isn't convincing at all, since the straight lines of blood look like they were drawn on with a red marker. Then there is some red goop on his ear, but she didn't have time to make that look real, either. All she did is make the whole ear red. But where is the bullet hole? We seem to be missing a bullet hole. If a bullet had taken off even a centimeter of the edge of the ear, it would be bleeding profusely, and we would see blood dripping from his earlobe down onto his shirt and jacket.

{The blood around the ear looks fairly realistic to me, but not entirely. The two lines of blood on his face in Image #1 don’t seem to make sense, since the bullet would have been going the opposite direction, so the blood would have had to go backward and also curve around toward the front of his face. And in Image #2 it seems that there should be blood in Trump’s hair and his hair should have been affected by the bullet. I agree with Mathis that there should have been blood dripping onto his clothes.

UPDATE 7/19/24: My comment was too hasty & I’m an amateur. I just saw this image.

IMAGE #5. That’s apparently Trump when he ducked down onto the stage floor. That made me realize that the blood went forward onto his face because it dripped that direction from his ear when his face was facing the floor. There’s an additional line of blood in this image that doesn’t seem to be in Image #1 and this one looks like blood that’s running. The images in this post are not in chronological order. #3 was first, then this one, #5, then #1 and #2. It could be that 2 came before 1, but 3 & 5 came before them. Since I’m confused about the middle line of blood, which isn’t apparent in Image #1. I don’t see how it could have been rubbed away without also removing the other two lines of blood.}

Then there's the little problem about allowing him to stand up and do his little dance, gesturing to the crowd and so on {in Image #1}. They had to get the picture for the papers. But if this had been real they would have kept him down. He would never have been allowed to stand back up almost immediately, making himself a target again. That was against all protocol and logic.

Next we come to the assessment that has made the papers, that being the Secret Service acted nothing like the Secret Service. Some are implicating Secret Service, implying there was some sort of stand down, but that is again misdirection. Yes, the strange (in)actions of the Secret Service indicate either a stand down OR they indicate a faked event. So why is no one in the mainstream or alternative press on either side allowed to point that out? Only a few wingnuts like minor actresses are saying it, and they are being leapt on from all quarters as insane. But what is insane about it? Logically, it should be the first thing to mark off, right? Any real investigation would start by proving the event happened. These are Hollywood people, after all. Trump is an actor and has worked on TV and with WWE, both masters of fakery. So there is nothing insane about looking closely at this event for signs it was staged. If we do that, it quickly becomes clear it was allowed to happen, but not because SS wanted Trump dead. It was allowed to happen because it was staged. Occam's Razor applies here, since the staging explanation is far simpler than any other explanation.

{I agree. A spectator was interviewed after the incident. He claimed to see the shooter climb up on a building. And he kept pointing at him while he told Security. He told them a guy was climbing up with a rifle, but Security ignored him. Another report claimed that a sniper with Security saw the shooter for 3 minutes before he fired any shots, but Security wouldn’t let the sniper shoot the shooter until the shooter fired numerous shots at Trump.}

IMAGE #3.

Then we have the miracle picture of the bullet flying by Trump. They really think you are stupid, to buy that photoshopped POS. That was allegedly captured by a NYT photographer. Convenient. So how fast was his shutter speed? Well, they saw that question coming, because they tell us he was using a Sony A1 at 1/8000s. Since Trump is not known to move 1000 feet per second himself, it is unclear why the photographer would be using that shutter speed. But let's say he was. At that shutter speed, how far would the bullet move?

{In one 8,000th of a second, a 2,000 feet per second bullet would go 2,000 divided by 8,000 = 1/4th foot = 3 inches, so a footlong line is wrong. And the photo is good evidence of preplanning.}

{One spectator was supposedly killed, but Mathis finds evidence that he was not killed.}

VIDEO #2.

UPDATE 7/19/24: In Video #2 above, the author criticized conspiracy theorists for suggesting that the bullet streak was photo-shopped. Mathis said above that the streak is too long to have been photographed in one 8 thousandth of a second, which I showed is likely true. But then I realized that the shutter speed might have not been set at maximum speed. It could have been set for one fourth or so of maximum, in which case the streak would be 4 or so times as long, which it appears to be. It’s looking less likely that the shooting was faked, but as usual I reserve the right to change my mind.

IMAGE #4.

That's the alleged shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks, in a Blackrock commercial from last year. For some reason not given, Blackrock shot their commercial at Bethel Park Highschool, where Crooks was a student. Blackrock has now admitted that is him, removing the commercial from any future rotation. That is being sold as some sort of wild coincidence, but it isn't. Any student appearing in this commercial would be handpicked by the directors. They don't just shoot randomly and then ask students to sign a release. My guess is Crooks is related to someone high up at Blackrock, and this was his first foot-wetting for his career. What career? CIA, of course. His fake death in this event is the perfect entry into CIA, since he now has cover. The best cover available: a faked death.

{I agree that it’s highly suspicious that the shooter just happened to be in a Blackrock commercial last year. Mathis goes on to show that the Crooks family has deep connections with the Establishment.}

{The takeaway in all this for me is that the Mainstream is apparently preparing to make Trump President again and Trump is totally faking his opposition to the mainstream media and the Deep State and so is the media. And it’s very possibly part of the centuries-long plan to stage a Biblical Armageddon for a fake End Times, in which they want Christians to rapture away and stop bothering them.}

{PS, this video helps prove Trump’s fakery, including regarding vaxes: Trump’s SHOCKING SECRET CALL is LEAKED by RFK JR.’s Son}

VIDEO #3.

{From the MeidasTouch channel, very pro-Democrat and anti-Trump -- I'm anti-both, as well as anti-clotshot.}

{Here’s another interesting video.}