The following was the last Blog post by Liz Harris in January, 2018. It discusses Money, History & Conspiracies. Her blog can still be viewed at https://monetarysov.wordpress.com/.
By the way, I hadn’t heard of the representative Liz Harris in Arizona until just now (March 15). I’m pretty sure they’re not the same person.
End {the title of her last blog post}
Posted on December 28, 2017 by Liz Harris
28 Dec 2017 – This blog has been terminated, owing to lack of reader interest.
LK says: January 1, 2018 at 10:12 pm
That’s very sad. This was a very uplifting, informative blog. I’ve been dropping in every two weeks to read it. Please tell us where you will be writing next.
Liz Harris says: January 2, 2018 at 5:48 am
Many thanks for stopping by.
I do not consider other politically-oriented blogs to be any better than this one, but I am clearly wrong about that. All of them are much better, since they all get reader comments, whereas I almost never do.
If I knew why I was turning people off, I could make adjustments, but I can’t know without feedback. Maybe it was the satirical images that I included. I don’t know. Whatever the cause, the absence of feedback made me feel that I was barking at the wind.
Thanks again for visiting and commenting.
LK says: January 4, 2018 at 7:38 pm
If you want to organize a focus group, I’d volunteer.
Liz Harris says: January 4, 2018 at 9:22 pm
I don’t know how to do that. Do you?
Also, I would be willing to co-blog with others, whether in this blog or elsewhere.
LK says: January 7, 2018 at 6:50 pm
I like your ideas etc, so I’d like to help if I can.
Maybe you could work with this group: Positive Money at http://positivemoney.org/It’s associated with an International network of organisations at http://internationalmoneyreform.org/
The U.S. isn’t on the list, so here’s a link on Starting a new national movement for monetary reform (in the U.S. etc):
http://internationalmoneyreform.org/starting-a-new-national-movement-for-monetary-reform/
This young guy seems to be humanitarian and pretty smart politically. Maybe he’d be willing to post your blogs on his blog at https://www.jordansather.com/blog/ . He also has a youtube channel, Destroying the Illusion, at https://youtube.com/channel/UCMVTRzCXvIbdK0Y1ZxD-BlA/videos . I think he’s only had the channel for a year and he already gets over 100,000 views for each video, which he posts almost daily. I doubt if he’s heard of sovereign or positive money, but, since he’s smart, maybe he’ll be impressed. His contact form on his blog is at https://www.jordansather.com/contact-2/
Focus Group Instructions
http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/assessment/assessing-community-needs-and-resources/conduct-focus-groups/main
You could probably do a focus group in a chat room online. Or you could have an Idea Party, which seems simpler, explained at http://lin4.webs.com/ under Problems Solutions List.
Liz Harris says: January 7, 2018 at 8:39 pm
Thanks. I will take a look at all these, but I already know about the “Positive Money” people. They’re a British group that suffers from Ellen Brown Syndrome (EBS) which is an illness that makes people think all money is lent into existence by banks. For EBS victims there is no such thing as government spending; only government borrowing. Nothing can penetrate their shell. They want “positive money” meaning government-created money, which already exists.
I wrote many posts about them when I was still blogging. Poor things.
LK says: January 8, 2018 at 11:27 pm
I read some of your blogs about EBS, but I thought some of the Positive Money people had the same views as Sovereign Money people. What do you think of Roger Mitchell at https://mythfighter.com/? I think he only disagrees about taxes. He wants to tax the super-rich to give everyone equal opportunity sooner. I guess it would be okay if the states taxed them, so the money wouldn’t be destroyed. He also believes in global warming. I don’t know if you do, but I don’t.
A lot of alternative media people have been expressing a lot of hope that Q-anon posts on 4Chan and 8Chan etc are real and that they show that Trump is draining the swamp in DC. It seems that Q may well be connected to Trump. I’ve been a little hopeful as a result of those videos, but I just saw one at
by Dark Journalist that suggests that Q is a false prophet that’s just a corporate marketing strategy to try to control the alternative media, whether for Trump or whomever. I now think that’s much more likely. And I hope the alt media doesn’t get co-opted.
Liz Harris says: January 9, 2018 at 4:56 pm
“{LK said:} I read some of your blogs about EBS, but I thought some of the Positive Money people had the same views as Sovereign Money people.”
No, the Positive Money people have sealed themselves in an impenetrable bubble. They do not understand what money is, or how it operates. As I said, they believe that all money is created by banks as loans. Hence they do not understand what the “national debt” is. I have tried to communicate with them. It’s hopeless. One time I even met Ellen Brown in person, and I tried to explain the facts to her. Again, hopeless.
“{LK said:} What do you think of Roger Mitchell? I think he only disagrees about taxes. He wants to tax the super-rich to give everyone equal opportunity sooner. I guess it would be okay if the states taxed them, so the money wouldn’t be destroyed. He also believes in global warming. I don’t know if you do, but I don’t.”
I agree with most of Mitchell’s views regarding money, but outside of that topic, I agree with Mitchell about some things, but I disagree with him about other things. I used to comment on his blog, but I became fed up with his idiocy, his hypocrisy, and his obsession with attacking Trump. (Not that I am a fan of Trump. I’m not a fan of any politician.) Regarding Mitchell’s call for taxing the rich, I have not seen that. Also, Mitchell refuses to understand the difference between Wall Street and Main Street — i.e. between the financial economy and the real economy. Regarding global climate change, I would be very interested to know why you do not believe that it is occurring.
“{LK said:} A lot of alternative media people have been expressing a lot of hope that Q-anon posts on 4Chan and 8Chan etc. are real, and that they show that Trump is draining the swamp in DC.”
I haven’t been following the Q-anon thing. Based on the YouTube video you referenced, it seems that “Q-anon” comments are dubious and manipulative. In any case, I do not spend time on message boards, since I prefer reasoned discourse instead of sound-bites, catch phrases, and cryptic abbreviations.
Regarding Trump “draining the swamp,” I don’t think the U.S. President has any real power. I think the real power lies with the rich and their puppet politicians, plus entrenched Washington bureaucrats and lobbyists. Therefore it matters little who is president. If we look past the surface rhetoric of Bush, Obama, and Trump, we see that nothing of substance ever changes in Washington. The gap between the rich and the rest continues to widen no matter what. Indeed, growing inequality is a global phenomenon. It’s occurring even in places like Israel and Iran.
Thanks for visiting. I enjoy communicating with you.
LK says: January 12, 2018 at 6:22 pm
Liz, is there any reason you can’t do videos? Jordan has just reached 100,000 subscribers in just under a year.
It would be interesting to hear how you attained your knowledge. I think you said you worked in the military at Minot, ND. That’s about all I know about your background. But it doesn’t seem to be a clue about how you came to understand sovereign money. I had read that the U.S. colonies developed prosperity in the 1750s by using scrip. Some say it was fiat currency, but one said it was backed by the land owned by the colonies. I read once that Austria prospered for a few years, maybe in the 1930s, using scrip. And some say Germany prospered in the 1930s by taking control of the banks, I think. It was interesting what you said about FDR helping toward prosperity in the 1930s with spending programs, which the Republicans then put a halt to. That helped me understand why the Great Depression lasted so long. Is there a way to explain sovereign money in simple terms, like using a community as an example? If a community of a hundred or a thousand people were to have their own government and print their own money, would that tend to produce prosperity there? Can you describe in a little detail how the prosperity would develop?
I never believed in global warming, because I’ve long known of alternative sciences and that big corporations control the government, as well as mainstream science. Margaret Mead was the president of the AAAS in 1974 and favored some of the first global warming scientists at that time (Oliver Manuel of Iron Sun fame found that the Bilderbergers are first known to have begun favoring global warming theory in 1967). When she was president, the AAAS held a kangaroo court (science conference) on Velikovsky’s claims that Venus is a young planet that nearly collided with Earth a few centuries ago. He was the only scientist of the time to predict that Venus would be extremely hot and in 1962 it was found that it is indeed so (Others expected it to be cold because of the thick cloud cover). So he had a lot of popular support. Four scientists were pitted against Velikovsky at the conference, but one was not strongly against his ideas, while the others were. He defended himself rather well, but the mainstream media all claimed that his arguments were thoroughly destroyed. The global warming scientists were using Venus as evidence that CO2 has a greenhouse effect, so they didn’t want people thinking that Venus was hot because it was a young planet. I believe they wanted them to think it was because of the high CO2 atmosphere. The mainstream, including Carl Sagan & Isaac Asimov et al, continued to call Velikovsky names & ridicule him for some years after that. It wasn’t until 1979 that Thatcher started supporting global warming theory and other governments came aboard. Until then scientists all believed that Earth was gradually cooling and expected another ice age.
A thousand years ago the climate was much warmer than now, so that the Vikings were able to colonize southern Greenland and raise cattle there. After a few centuries the climate got gradually colder, until it was no longer habitable. I don’t believe it’s habitable now either, for growing crops or animals. The 1930s were also much warmer than recent decades. At that time a large part of the U.S. stayed over 100 degrees Fahrenheit for weeks at a time. The IPCC was a politically appointed panel of scientists. There’s lots of evidence against CO2 being a significant greenhouse gas. John Casey has some books out showing that global cooling is imminent. The climate appears to be connected mainly to the sunspot cycles. When there are fewer sunspots for several cycles, the Earth gets colder. There’s a website, http://co2science.org, with lots of info.
Lionel Nation interviewed Dane W regarding geoengineering (climate engineering = chemtrails) lately at https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/what-the-hell-are-they-spraying/. This suggests that the global warming fad was engineered by the ruling class for some nefarious purpose, maybe population control. But Dane says the chemtrails are threatening to accomplish omnicide, as he says. I don’t think I would favor destruction of the biosphere myself.
Liz Harris says: January 13, 2018 at 1:57 pm
Today or tomorrow I’m going to write one more blog post with you in mind. That is, it will be addressed specifically to you.
“{LK said:} Liz, is there any reason you can’t do videos? Jordan has just reached 100,000 subscribers in just under a year:”
I did a couple of videos in the past, but they were merely slide shows. The video below, for example, features the music of a friend of mine who lives in Idaho. I did the images; he did the music and singing. It’s a statement against racism from five years ago.
{See also youtube.com/watch?v=7_BvzGbaPjA regarding the Dresden holocaust.}
Yes I should do some instructive videos on YouTube. I must learn how to do some very basic animation. I’ll check out Jordan’s videos as soon as I’m done writing these comments.
“{LK said:} It would be interesting to hear how you attained your knowledge. I think you said you worked in the military at Minot, ND. That’s about all I know about your background. But it doesn’t seem to be a clue about how you came to understand sovereign money.”
I was a nuclear weapons specialist with the US Air Force. Later I was a cop (LAPD) and then a banker and then did several other things. I drifted between careers and between countries. I have lived in India, Mexico, and Belarus, and I also made extended visits to the UK, Holland, Russia, and Japan. These visits were personal, and I learned to speak several languages. Today I’m rusty with all of them except Spanish.
A guy from Syria owns a local convenience store. He thinks I was with the CIA.
Anyway, the key to understanding sovereign money is attitude. As I often discussed in my blog posts, in our youth we develop psychological mechanisms that enable us to cope with our misery, but which also keep us paralyzed. These coping mechanisms limit us like we were saddle-broken horses. Our mechanisms get us through each day, but they make us deny what we see with our own eyes. If we can break out of our mental programming, the truth becomes simple.
Here’s a three-step example…
[1] Fear only exists in the human mind. Fear is not like gravity or electricity or kinetic energy.
[2] Numbers only exist in the human mind. I can write “1” or “6” but these are symbols that represent numbers. (Numbers themselves only exist in the human mind.) In a sports game, points only exist in the human mind. I can write “1” or “6” on a scoreboard, but these are symbols that represent points. (Points only exist in the human mind.)
[3] Dollars only exist in the human mind. I can write “1” or “6” in my bank account, but these symbols are not dollars. They represent dollars, which only exist in the human mind. A dollar bill in your hand is not a dollar. It is a symbol (a token) that represents a dollar.
Since numbers, points, and dollars have no physical existence, they have no physical limit. They are created out of thin air, and they only exist in the human mind. Therefore anyone who says that the U.S. government is bankrupt is a liar or is “saddle-broken” like a horse. When we let go of our mental programing, everything falls into place.
To some extent, mental programming is necessary for society to exist. For instance, we must be trained to use a language (such as English) so we can communicate, but our training also limits us individually and collectively.
“{LK said:} I had read that the U.S. colonies developed prosperity in the 1750s by using scrip. Some say it was fiat currency, but one [person] said it was backed by the land owned by the colonies.”
“Scrip” does not come from the word “scripture,” but from “scrap,” as in scrap of paper used as a receipt, or a certificate, or a brief note, or a written list or a paper currency note. Colonial scrip was paper currency (or notes of credit) issued by privately owned banks. The “positive money” people think that colonial currency fostered colonial liberty, since colonists did not use currency notes issued by the bank of England. In reality colonial bankers were as corrupt as any other bankers. As issuers of the currency, and keepers of the bank ledgers, the colonial bankers ran increasingly larcenous scams that put ordinary people into so much debt that eventually people stopped using the scrip of one bank, and instead used the scrips (i.e. currency notes) of other banks. For this reason, colonial banks came and went. Banks are merely the keepers of the money ledger.
Since money is so important to us, we think of bankers as somehow “superior beings” when in fact they are simply the keepers of the scoreboard in the game of life. In many respects they are the lowest of the low, and the worse form of thieves.
In 1781 the fledgling U.S. government chartered the privately owned Bank of North America, which failed because of corruption. In 1791 the U.S. government chartered the privately owned First Bank of the United States, which failed because of corruption (the U.S. government did not renew its charter). In 1816 the U.S. government chartered the privately owned Second Bank of the United States, which failed because of corruption (the U.S. government did not renew its charter).
Each time the U.S. government did this, the government became better at working with these banks, but there was always the corruption factor. Since money consists of numbers written on bank ledgers, bankers find it tempting to steal via creative accounting.
During the U.S. Civil War the North issued scrip, called dollars (or “greenbacks”) and created the U.S. Secret Service to police the use of currency notes. Finally in 1913 we got the Federal Reserve. It too is privately owned, but the Fed must ultimately follow the orders of the U.S. government.
“{LK said:} I read once that Austria prospered for a few years, maybe in the 1930s, using scrip. And some say Germany prospered in the 1930s by taking control of the banks, I think.”
All paper currency is scrip, regardless of who issues it. A U.S. dollar bill is scrip. A euro note is scrip. Germany was crippled by Allied demands for “war reparations,” and by the corruption of the central bank (Reichsbank). The Nazis actually privatized the Reichsbank in order to cut its tentacles into the parliament. The first head of the new Reichsbank, Hjalmar Schact, cooperated with the Nazis at first, but he too was corrupt, and was removed in 1937.
(During the Nuremburg show trials, Schact was saved by Montagu Norman, head of the Bank of England, and by a Jewish financier named Lord Viscount Bearsted. Top bankers and financiers stick together, while they regard the rest of us as scum.)
As I said, the Nazis privatized the Reichsbank, but they maintained control over it. As a result, in only five years Germany went from Europe’s poorest nation to its most prosperous in ratio to population. The Nazis introduced novel concepts like maternity leave, two weeks paid vacations, showers and cafeterias in factories, and television. All labor unions were outlawed, since they were hopelessly corrupt, and were replaced by a national labor union called the German Workers’ League.
I myself am a paleo-Nazi (as opposed to a neo-Nazi). That is, I am an American National Socialist. I am not a racist, but neither was Hitler, as I can explain if you are interested.
Nationalism and fascism can be used for good or ill. They can be used to create or destroy; to promote equality or inequality; to create a heaven or a hell.
“{LK said:} It was interesting what you said about FDR helping toward prosperity in the 1930s with spending programs, which the Republicans then put a halt to. That helped me understand why the Great Depression lasted so long.”
For the first seven years the Depression was not as bad as many people think. However the central bankers and the financiers were jealous of FDR’s success and popularity, so in 1937 they seduced FDR into allowing for a radical austerity program, i.e. dramatic cuts in federal spending. This plunged the U.S. economy back into a Depression that was worse than ever. This second phase of the Depression did not end until the U.S. entered WW II, at which point the USA adopted a command economy (i.e. it was led and managed by the central government).
“{LK said:} Is there a way to explain sovereign money in simple terms, like using a community as an example?”
I often used the Monopoly Board game as an analogy. Monopoly money is just scraps of paper (i.e. scrip) which facilitate the game by letting players keep score. Likewise, actual money facilitates real life by letting people keep score. A U.S. dollar is simply a unit of account.
“{LK said:} If a community of a hundred or a thousand people were to have their own government and print their own money, would that tend to produce prosperity there? Can you describe in a little detail how the prosperity would develop?
Prosperity is a not a product of money, but of people’s attitudes toward each other. If no one was selfish, dishonest, and hateful, then any monetary system would allow prosperity. It wouldn’t matter what kind of money system we used, or who issued the money. Again, people, not money, are what produce prosperity. Depending on people’s collective attitudes, money can facilitate [1] equality / prosperity or [2] inequality / poverty.
Robert Owen (1771 –1858) was a Welsh textile manufacturer and a social reformer. He owned a number of factories, and he experimented with various socialist plans, including currency systems, employee housing, and so on. Mr. Owen realized that whenever a group of people grows past a certain size (a certain number), corruption sets in. People lose their sense of community. They become selfish, hateful, and larcenous. Society splits into rich and poor.
Today we have seven billion people, few of which have ever talked to their next door neighbors. Inequality is inevitable, and it becomes worse each day.
Therefore the problem is not money, but in people’s collective attitudes. If two football teams on a field engage in dirty tricks, the problem is not in the scoreboard points, but in the players, and in the keepers of the scoreboard. Points, numbers, and dollars are all neutral. A knife is neutral. We can use it to cut butter, or kill people. We can use money to facilitate equality or inequality.
Regarding your comments on global warming (I prefer the term climate change), let me get back to you on that, because right now I must pay my electric bill before I am cut off. Apologies.
LK says: January 13, 2018 at 8:31 pm
Interesting career. And I remember now that you said you were a cop one year. It would also be interesting to know what books you’ve read that most helped develop your knowledge, if those are what did it, or whatever you learned so much from.
I had read that Ben Franklin claimed that the English colonies were prospering in the 1750s. I think he told that to someone in Britain when he was an ambassador there before the Revolution. And he claimed that scrip was a cause of the prosperity. Do you know of evidence that Franklin lied or exaggerated? The article I read stated that the English bankers then determined to cash in by having the English government force the colonists to use only proper currency from their banks. And it said this was one of the main causes of the Revolution, because it led to economic depression.
I started doubting the 1930s & 40s German holocaust against Jews and others over a year ago when I started finding revisionist history online. It seems that the Zionist media were primarily to blame for the widespread belief in German villainy. Those articles and one book suggested that Germany & other European countries were fighting against severely violent communist aggression, mostly from Russia (by Zionists). They gave the impression that Hitler was a very decent man. But one thing I’ve heard previously, which I haven’t heard rebutted yet, is that Hitler refused to send winter clothing to the German troops in Russia, which resulted in the troops having great hardship during the severe winter cold, and helped lead to their defeat. Have you heard anything about that?
Recently I found Miles Mathis’ website at http://mileswmathis.com/updates.html . In one of his papers there he mentioned evidence that the bombing of Dresden by the Allies was greatly exaggerated. He said it was propaganda meant to demoralize the “enemy”. He also has one or more papers showing that Hitler may have been a Jew and maybe a Zionist and that his death was faked. He finds that a lot of famous deaths have been faked and that a lot of the fakers were rich Jews. Some examples are Lincoln, Billy the Kid, many serial killers, including Manson, the Vegas shooting, JFK, RFK, MLK, and so on. He found that nuclear weapons and the moon landings were faked too. I don’t think he regards his findings as definitive, but they at least give reason to speculate & maybe investigate. He’s an artist, mathematician and a good science writer.
John Casey said he thought global warming was real until about 2007, when something got him to investigate, and he soon found that the evidence from researchers he read was strong that the sunspot cycle controls climate. He went on to do research of his own and has published a few books. He said it was shortly after his book/s came out that Obama changed the term from global warming to climate change, apparently to cover both warming and cooling, to cover all the bases.
So it sounds like you’re going to give me an early birthday present. I’m surprised no one else is joining in the discussion here. There were several people making comments. Maybe they thought The End meant no more communication. That reminds me of a poem about The End is Coming. A man was waiting for the bus, when someone informed him that the end was coming. So he decided to go to a nearby store to use his bus fare to buy cigarettes, since there wouldn’t be any buses. Then it came and the end went on down the street instead of the bus.
Liz Harris says: January 13, 2018 at 11:33 pm
“{LK said:} I had read that Ben Franklin claimed that the English colonies were prospering in the 1750s. I think he told that to someone in Britain when he was an ambassador there before the Revolution. And he claimed that scrip was a cause of the prosperity. Do you know of evidence that Franklin lied or exaggerated? The article I read stated that the English bankers then determined to cash in by having the English government force the colonists to use only proper currency from their banks. And it said this was one of the main causes of the Revolution, because it led to economic depression.”
The Ben Franklin quote is apocryphal. There is no evidence that Franklin ever said that or wrote that about colonial scrip. Ellen Brown fabricated the quote in her book “Web of Debt,” pp 40-41, because Ellen (falsely) believes that all money is created by banks as loans. Ellen Brown thinks we would be better off if governments created money, which governments already do (except for governments who have surrendered their monetary sovereignty like the euro-zone nations have).
Banks do create money when they make loans, but governments with monetary sovereignty also create money when they spend. Ellen denies the second part. So do the “positive money” people.
Ellen Brown was actually challenged on the fabricated Ben Franklin quote, so she removed her claim from the fourth edition of her book Web of Debt.
The British government fully understood the power of being able to create money, and hence in 1764 forbade colonial governments from issuing official paper money, minting coins, or establishing local note-issuing private banks. So how could Franklin have been in England, boasting about the colonies creating their own money? Creating their own money would have been illegal before the War of Independence. Besides, Ben Franklin was never the U.S. ambassador to England, although Franklin was the first U.S. ambassador to France (1776–1785).
After the War of Independence, colonial banks started issuing their own scrip (i.e. currency notes).
“{LK said:} I started doubting the 1930s & 40s German holocaust against Jews and others over a year ago when I started finding revisionist history online. It seems that the Zionist media were primarily to blame for the widespread belief in German villainy. Those articles and one book suggested that Germany & other European countries were fighting against severely violent communist aggression, mostly from Russia (by Zionists). They gave the impression that Hitler was a very decent man. But one thing I’ve heard previously, which I haven’t heard rebutted yet, is that Hitler refused to send winter clothing to the German troops in Russia, which resulted in the troops having great hardship during the severe winter cold, and helped lead to their defeat. Have you heard anything about that?”
Yes, but I cannot go into much depth in this confined space. The “holocaust” is a myth; a hoax. It never happened. For Jews the hoax is the Holy of Holies. For everyone else the hoax is a means to excuse their own evil (“At least we’re not as bad as Hitler”).
Regarding communist aggression, Germany was forced to pre-emptively invade the USSR because Stalin was days away from invading all of Europe. During the first several months of Operation Barbarossa, the Germans had spectacular success because the Soviets were not dug in. The Soviets were in offensive mode, not defensive. Naturally these facts have been purged from the history books because, “holocaust!”
Hitler never wanted war. He had been a soldier in the First World War, and he knew how devastating war was. But neither could Hitler allow Stalin to overrun all of Europe, including France, Germany, and the UK.
Thus, Hitler was Western Europe’s savior. And yes, he was a decent man. A compassionate man. All the vilification of him is the opposite of reality, designed to justify our own aggression and self-righteousness.
The facts about the USSR’s imminent invasion of all Europe were first exposed by Russian writer Viktor Suvorov in his book, Icebreaker: Who Started the Second World War? and in his subsequent books. Stalin wanted Germany to fight the Western allies until Germany was exhausted enough for the USSR to crush all of Europe. The Allies had the opposite view. They wanted Germany to fight the USSR until both were exhausted enough for the Allies to rule Europe. In both schemes, Germany was the “icebreaker.”
You can read about Viktor Suvorov in Wikipedia. Suvorov got his information from old official Soviet archives. He explodes the myth that the USSR was an innocent victim of German aggression.
Naturally his revelations caused a huge outcry of rage (see wikipedia: “Soviet offensive plans controversy) as historians tried (and failed) to debunk Suvorov’s information.
Still, facts don’t matter, since people love their fairy tales. The holo-hoax was real, Hitler was Satan, we are saints, and the USSR was an innocent victim.
Incidentally you once asked me what I thought about Rodger Malcom Mitchell. Since he is a Zionist Jew, Mitchell and I do not agree on anything outside the realm of economics. Even if he were not a militant Jew, he is too old (83) to be reasonable. He whines about things like “immigrant rights,” while he blesses Israel’s treatment of Palestinians.
“{LK said:} One thing I’ve heard previously, which I haven’t heard rebutted yet, is that Hitler refused to send winter clothing to the German troops in Russia, which resulted in the troops having great hardship during the severe winter cold, and helped lead to their defeat. Have you heard anything about that?”
Because of the imminent invasion by the USSR, Germany was forced to preemptively invade with insufficient trucks or logistical support. For Operation Barbarossa, the Germans relied on 750,000 horses, which required 4,500 tons of feed every day. The German army was 80% horse-drawn. That’s how ill-equipped the Germans were. Operation Barbarossa started 22 June 1941. The Germans knew that if they did not conquer the USSR within five months, winter would set in, and the Germans would be defeated. However they lasted another four years. How could that have happened if Hitler had refused to send winter clothing to the troops? This nonsense is intended to vilify Hitler.
Incidentally Iran and Iraq were officially neutral during the war. The British savagely invaded both nations to get the oil. Today we justify this aggression because “holocaust,” and “Hitler was evil,” and all the other lies.
“{LK said:} Recently I found Miles Mathis’ website at http://mileswmathis.com/updates.html. In one of his papers there he mentioned evidence that the bombing of Dresden by the Allies was greatly exaggerated. He said it was propaganda meant to demoralize the “enemy”. He also has one or more papers showing that Hitler may have been a Jew and maybe a Zionist and that his death was faked. He finds that a lot of famous deaths have been faked and that a lot of the fakers were rich Jews. Some examples are Lincoln, Billy the Kid, many serial killers, including Manson, the Vegas shooting, JFK, RFK, MLK, and so on. He found that nuclear weapons and the moon landings were faked too. I don’t think he regards his findings as definitive, but they at least give reason to speculate & maybe investigate. He’s an artist, mathematician and a good science writer.
I would need to see much proof before I believed any of these claims. I will check out Mathis’ web site. Nuclear weapons faked? I wish that was true. I was a nuclear weapons specialist with the US Air Force, so I probably know more about that topic than Mathis does.
“{LK said:} John Casey said he thought global warming was real until about 2007, when something got him to investigate, and he soon found that the evidence from researchers he read was strong that the sunspot cycle controls climate. He went on to do research of his own and has published a few books. He said it was shortly after his book/s came out that Obama changed the term from global warming to climate change, apparently to cover both warming and cooling, to cover all the bases.”
I will have to look into Casey. Your previous comments were the first skepticism regarding climate change that sounds reasonable to me. I’m still processing your comments.
“{LK said:} … I’m surprised no one else is joining in the discussion here. There were several people making comments. Maybe they thought The End meant no more communication.”
Evidently people don’t like what I have to say.
I never sought widespread feedback. I only wanted enough reader responses to indicate that I was not barking at the wind. Every other blog gets many responses, and they don’t include satirical images like I did.
Oh well.
LK says: January 14, 2018 at 5:05 pm
I seldom read blogs myself. I only came across this one and Mythfighter a couple months ago or so. Mathis just has a couple websites, rather than blogs, but he updates them often, so they’re like blogs. I’ve read his science site for 6 or 7 years, I guess, but his conspiracy site only recently. His science site points out major errors in math and physics and he’s been developing his own model, which seems mostly plausible to me. He has a lot of readers, it seems, including many scientists, though he doesn’t post many images. He’s fairly sarcastic, like you, but in writing rather than images. I like your sarcastic images myself. I think a lot of people would, if they knew about your blog. People might get tired of the sovereign money issue after a while, so they’d probably prefer more variety, or else more details or directions for how to implement your suggestions. I think people would like to hear many of the things you know about history etc, as well as economics. They’d like to hear your comments about the Vegas shooting, I’m sure. Mathis thinks that was faked and that Lockheed was behind it to help sell their new security scanners to Vegas hotels. He thinks Paddock was the same person as his brother. He found that some faked killings involve people who have siblings who look just like themselves, as is the case with Nicole Simpson for example. Even if nuclear weapons are real, it’s possible that most of the public tests were faked. If astronauts landed on the Moon, some of the events could still have been faked. Jordan has been discussing advanced technology that he says was secretly used to get to the Moon, i.e. ET tech. He says Trump is planning to end the secrecy. I’ve tended to think the ET stuff has always been faked, but Dark Journalist seems to think there’s some reality behind it, and it seems that he has a lot of experience and good sense, so I’m curious about it. What about you? Do you have opinions about ETs and UFOs? My main interest is in ending major corruption and thus making it possible for everyone to achieve prosperity, especially in attitude. Thank you for filling me in more on history and economics etc. People at Voat.co would probably like much of your material. That’s a forum similar to Reddit. But I suppose YouTube and other video sites would get you the biggest audience quickest. I don’t like social media, but some of your fans would help spread the word there, if you had videos. I hope to keep learning from you. I have plenty more questions for you.LK says: January 19, 2018 at 12:05 pm
I hope to hear back soon. Or email me.
LK says: January 20, 2018 at 1:06 pm
Mathis has a new post showing that the WW2 German attacks on London were at least largely faked. See http://mileswmathis.com/hitler2.pdf
… LK says: February 15, 2018 at 9:06 pm
Liz, please let us know where to find you online. Can you give classes to activitsts?